Follow us on social media for latest updates
Telegram - @FzGroup | Instagram - @FzMovie | Twitter - @FzGroup
Not bad (by EvolBob) |
Great movie, go see it!Now for the other reviews above - what a bunch of wan*ers! I have not read the books and I only saw this flick today by a fluke of timing. The midnight viewing had only one ticket left when I asked, so I thought why not. I had been told it was just a chick-flick and I wouldn't like it, but I'm glad I did see it and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I'm predicting it will make a truck load of money for all involved. Judging by the reaction of the audience, I'm sure I'm not alone in saying this will be considered the number 1 movie of 2009.True, it isn't <more> |
Exeedingly Better Than The First (by werstnightmare2002) |
First off, I don't understand all the bashing for this movie. It was beautifully made and was FAR better made than the first movie. Then again most of these reviews don't have proper spelling or grammar so I can't take them very seriously. They also don't have clear understanding of the book and are not judging the movie on how its made and how the movie sells the story line to someone who has never been exposed to the Twilight Saga.To start off, the beginning of the movie was sweet and slightly painful. Kristen Stewart's acting with Robert Pattinson is horrible but then <more> |
Did We See The Same Movie???? (by sxylilrckstar) |
I'm reading through these comments and I am just... I don't even have a word. People upset about the long opening of showing the title... wth? What did that matter? It's quite a petty point. The eyes that they changed, which I had noticed from the trailers, I actually really liked. It was more of what I pictured in the book... and at least they didn't show any closeups that literally showed the contact lines like Twilight. Yes they went through things a bit choppy and quick relying a lot on the readers of the book, but they tried to put in as much from the book as they could. <more> |
Thought it was great (by nyssaanne) |
Thought Chris Weitz was a far better director than Hardwicke. Enjoyed the film, set up for Eclipse quite nicely. This review is probably more of a response to others negative reviews:Yes, it is cheesy, and goofy at times, but hello! The writing in the book isn't that great either! And I'm a fan! This is not a vampire movie in the sense of, "I've come to suck your blood!" This is based on a fantasy book whose main characters are vampires, and gives a different idea of what that mythical creature could be like. I think given the story they did a great job. It is definitely <more> |
Not Bad. It's for the diehards. (by DarcyStar) |
I loved the books and first movie flaws and all. New Moon is not without flaws but enjoyable for a die-hard fan.The movie is long and rather slow paced but if you love the world of Twilight then you don't mind. Kristen Stewart holds the movie together. Luckily there's a strong actress for the part of Bella otherwise this movie would fail miserably. She truly delivers the pain of losing Edward. There were tears in my eyes during the break up scene.As for the wolves - Taylor was decent but the rest of them need to take some acting lessons.The Volturi - Michael Sheen and Dakota Fanning <more> |
Amazing (by kletcher72) |
The new director did a magnificent job of making New Moon portray the book accordingly. It was a fabulous movie that any Twilight fans should go see. All the characters correspond to the book version amazingly. The story throughout the movie keeps the audience involved, and the special features used are also fantastically put together. Every actor deserves an immense amount of credit, and the director especially thank you so much for making the movie like the book, us twilight fans really appreciate it. Also I know in my experience when reading the book i was all Team Edward however the way <more> |
Wait--what? People are upset?? (by leaderoftheelves) |
Ahh, what a fickle bunch Twilight fans are. I remember the release of the first film last year, and the incredible backlash from fans of the series--can't even remember the number of comments saying "Stick to the book!" Incredible liberties were taken with the plot or did we all forget the butchering of the much-beloved meadow scene in the first movie? , and too much of Hardwicke's own film-making style was imposed upon a story that was not hers to fiddle with.Then New Moon comes out. Obviously, the screenwriter and director went to great lengths to painstakingly recreate <more> |
Better Than Twilight! (by goodandbadnews) |
We were fortunate to get to see a premiere of New Moon in Knoxville. Taylor Lautner and Kristen Stewart were there to help raise money for Regal cinemas Variety children's charity. I'm proud to say that it was a great success as over $400,000 was given by Twilight fans.Now for the movie! I would imagine that most fans of the series would have two questions? Did the movie follow the book and how many minutes of the film included Robert Pattinson. As most readers will know, its impossible to get a 500 page book into a two hour film. I think that the Twilight and New Moon movies have <more> |
Watch it, don't scrutinise it. (by hulahoopwounds) |
I'm not a serious 'twi-hard' fan, I only got into the whole thing in the summer. I put off reading the books because of the hype, I didn't want to jump on the band waggon. Four or five days and Breaking Dawn later, I can sympathise with the hype. The books after fantastic, even as a 22 year old female, they take you back to childhood fantasy, romance, lust and love. I of course watched Twilight, pretty much after I'd finished reading the book and loved it, it was fantastic seeing the pages of the book come to life. Yes the acting wasn't great, and some of the direction <more> |